← All meetings

• 1 Results pendingunofficial

  Presentation and discussion of the City Manager’s Fiscal Year 2026-2027 Proposed Budget.

  This is a work session where the City Manager walks Council through the proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2026-2027. It's the starting point for the annual conversation about how Austin spends its money and sets its priorities, giving Council and the public a first look before any decisions get made.

  "Presentation and discussion of the city manager's fiscal year 2026 2027 proposed budget"

  • Staff presented a 2% property tax scenario at the mayor's request, showing $10.7M fewer general fund dollars requiring elimination of discretionary investments
  • Multiple public speakers advocated for social service contracts, capital idea workforce funding, and raising temporary employee wages above the proposed $0.10
  • Councilmember Cadien announced plans to roll out an alternative 2.5% budget starting next week
• 2 Results pendingunofficial

  Conduct a public hearing on proposed charter amendments including: A) clarifying that the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission is independent of Council control, allowing the ICRC to review City districts after changes to the City’s boundary lines, providing an effective date for the redistricting plan adopted by the ICRC, increasing the number of individuals in the pool of potential appointees to the ICRC, clarifying the method and timing of filling vacancies on the ICRC, and allowing City staff to communicate with the ICRC outside of a meeting; B) deleting language providing that the Council shall meet at least once each week; C) deleting language requiring the Council to determine its rules and order of business by ordinance; D) clarifying the meaning of the term “election” and to provide that the campaign contribution and expenditure limits shall be modified each year by January 1st instead of with the adoption of the budget; E) providing that initiative elections and petitioned charter amendment elections must be held on the next available November election date that occurs in an even-numbered year and that allows sufficient time to comply with other requirements of law; F) providing that a petition for an election to recall a Council Member other than the Mayor must contain valid signatures of at least 15% of the qualified voters of the respective Council district, instead of the current 10%, and clarifying that the affidavit on the recall petition must be signed by a petition circulator; G) providing that the Council appoints and removes the City Attorney; H) making the time frame for the automatic resignation provision for municipal court judges the same as that provided in the Texas Constitution for other officials; I) ensure that City financial practices are consistent with generally accepted accounting principles, reflect current practices for appropriations for department-level work programs; J) removing appointees and employees of the office of the City Auditor from the classified civil service; K) making non-substantive corrections of typographical errors, punctuation, and sentence structure, and to change or remove language that is moot or unenforceable because it has been superseded by state law or by a final court order; L) removing the restriction that officeholders must wait until after leaving office to solicit and accept political contributions to pay unpaid campaign expenses or to reimburse campaign expenditures made from personal funds and to impose contribution limits on such officeholders; and M) requiring an independent affordability and efficiency initiative before any tax rate increase and requiring the independent contractor to identify annual and multi-year savings; N) any other charter amendments proposed by the public.

  This is a public hearing on a big slate of proposed changes to the City Charter — Austin's foundational rulebook — that could land in front of voters. The proposals touch a lot of ground: making the Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission more independent, dropping the requirement that Council meet weekly, raising the signature threshold to recall a Council Member from 10% to 15% of a district's qualified voters, shifting who appoints and removes the City Attorney to the Council, and requiring an independent affordability and efficiency review before any tax rate increase. Because the hearing invites public input, item N also leaves the door open for additional charter amendments proposed by residents.

  "There will be no council action today on the charter amendments... we'll have discussion only by the council"

  • Mayor clarified action and vote on charter amendments would occur Thursday July 30th, with a menu-style item-by-item vote
  • A UT student urged fixing an eligibility drafting error excluding traditional college-age students from the ICRC seat designated for them; Councilmember Alter said she'd offer a motion Thursday to address it
  • Councilmember Siegel raised concerns that adding 12 ballot items could function as voter suppression by lengthening lines
  • Public speakers Betsy Greenberg and David Weinberg urged rejection of raising the recall threshold to 15% as an incumbent protection measure